326 People!
Please excuse this brief rant. I love that 326 people were reached with my post entitled “There MUST be a conspiracy.” There is a puzzling aspect to that reach. The content is, in my opinion, controversial. In effect, it says that the killer and at least...It MUST be a conspiracy!
In the murder of Stacey Burns, it may be stated as a fact that a conspiracy is in play. Is there a flaw in the following logic, and if, can you find it? Given: Stacey Burns was murdered in cold blood by a amoral, sociopathic killer. Given: Since there has not been an...“You just don’t get it, do you?”
A long time friend ( now a former friend for fifteen years or so) once said this to me in a letter. “You just don’t get it, do you?” It doesn’t matter any more what he was referencing in that comment but he was right. I didn’t get it. In...Votes (some) are in!
Re: Murder conspiracy- So far, four for yes, more than one person was involved in the murder of Stacey Burns; one has no idea. DukeNo votes!
In the post entitled “No conspiracies?”, I mentioned a poll. Over one hundred people saw that post which asked a simple question. Did the murderer of Stacey Burns act alone or in consort with others in the commission of the crime? Thus far, I can’t...
Grab a free copy of my book, The Week from Heaven and Hell