Today I received this email. The only thing new I see in it is in the 10th line down. It is the first time I’ve seen someone in authority use the phrase “state of admissible evidence.” (Could have missed this before but I don’t think so)
Further, it says the lack of this availability of admissible evidence is what “effects (sic-should be affects) moving forward.”
In my humble opinion, this is important because it seems to indicate that there is a strong suspect but there is not evidence to prosecute. This is vastly different than not having a suspect.
Am I wrong about this? (Would not be the first time!)
Duke
Here is the email…
May-10-2017
The fact that there have been no arrests in the Stacey Ann Keane Burns case
doesn’t mean that this case is being ignored
Since May-10-2009
It has been reported that The Stacey Ann Keane Burns case has been worked by
Prosecutors, and Dozens of police officers that have worked diligently for hundreds of hours
It is true that… Some cases are solved quickly and others are not
There is a true commitment to this case by The State of New Hampshire and Friends and Family of Stacey Ann Keane Burns
there is a lot of work being done, publicly and behind the scenes
‘It is the state of admissible evidence currently available in this case that effects moving forward.’
The Stacey Ann Keane Burns case will continue to be staffed with a team from…
1. The NH Attorney General’s Office
2. The State Police Major Crime Unit
3. The NH Cold Case Unit
Anyone who wishes to provide information about the case can do so by contacting…
State Police Sergeant
Brian Strong
(603) 223-3648
coldcaseunit@dos.nh.gov
I think that statement was intentionally vague and non-commitable. Just an attempt to appease those seeking answers. However it does indicate they are taking notice and they recognize you as being the lightening rod.
More like a thorn in their foot than a lightening rod. No insult meant to you Duke. I’m not sure the information rings true…any of it. ‘The true commitment…[are] friends and family.’ That I can believe. Little if nothing else tells you what? We’re working on this case. We have all these important agencies working on this case. Hard to believe what they have produced with all their hundreds of hours of working on this case. Something does not ring true.
The statement “it is the state of admissible evidence currently available in this case that effects moving forward.” that is a huge thing to say. Seems to me the right judge could come along and it’s game on. AND… When Sgt. Strong says he’s on it, I believe him. for what that’s worth.